Follow Us
Join UsAnupam Kher recently responded to Ratna Pathak Shah’s characterization of acting institutes as “shops.” While he respects her viewpoint, he did question whether she would apply the same label to the prestigious National School of Drama (NSD). When Pinkvilla asked Anupam, who also has his own acting school, about Ratna’s comment, he stated that it is her opinion and he does not feel compelled to defend himself. In response to her statement, Anupam referenced a recent interview with Naseeruddin Shah where both actors pondered if NSD would also be considered a “shop.” He went on to suggest that perhaps the criticism stems from bitterness or a philosophical viewpoint. However, Anupam reiterated that he does not feel obliged to justify any presumptions others may hold. He concluded by acknowledging that people are entitled to their opinions and if they believe acting institutes are just shops, then so be it.
In a recent conversation with Pinkvilla, Anupam Kher addressed Ratna Pathak Shah’s comment about acting schools being referred to as “shops.” Although she holds a different view from his own, Anupam emphasized that everyone is entitled to their opinion. He also noted that both Ratna and Naseeruddin Shah are alumni of the National School Of Drama (NSD), where he himself runs an acting school. When asked about NSD potentially being considered a “shop,” Anupam stated that sometimes people make statements out of bitterness or philosophical musings. However, he believed it was not his place to justify their thoughts. Sharing an incident where he observed a confident actor become nervous in front of the camera, Anupam explained how it inspired him to open his own acting school and pass on his skills to aspiring actors. In response to Ratna’s comment, he expressed his belief that opening an acting school was not equivalent to running a shop, but rather a way of shaping the future generation of actors. Just like there are schools for journalism and dentistry, Anupam argued that running an acting school is just as important and should not be judged lightly. Additionally, he made it clear that Ratna’s statement.
When asked about any potential bitterness in their relationship due to their difference of opinion, he replied by saying that he chooses to focus on the positive aspects of people. Even the most difficult individuals have a good side. He shared a memory from when he purchased his first car and visited Mehboob Studio. On that day, actor Naseeruddin Shah happened to be in his own car. The warmth with which Shah greeted him is something he will always remember. According to Kher, despite any negative remarks Shah may make about him, it is this kind gesture that stands out in his mind. Most recently, Anupam Kher responded to Ratna Pathak Shah’s controversial statement about acting institutes being mere “shops”. In an interview with a leading publication, Kher voiced his disagreement with Pathak’s views and suggested that they could stem from bitterness.
Pathak’s remarks sparked a discussion in the Indian acting community, with numerous actors and industry experts sharing their thoughts. Kher, a renowned figure in both Indian and international cinema, offered a unique viewpoint on the issue. Emphasizing the significance of acting institutes, Kher emphasized their role in shaping the next generation of performers. These institutions provide aspiring actors with essential training and guidance to thrive in the fiercely competitive industry. He also stressed that acting is a skill that requires dedication, hard work, and continuous learning. Therefore, formal education and practical experience from acting institutes are crucial for honing one’s abilities. According to Kher, Pathak’s use of the term “shops” diminishes the value of these institutes and undermines the efforts of passionate individuals in this field. He advised aspiring actors to focus on their growth and development rather than getting consumed by negative rhetoric.
Kher’s reaction to Pathak’s statements showcases his strong dedication to the craft of acting and his belief in the significance of education and preparation. As a well-regarded presence in the field, his thoughts hold influence and serve as a prompt to recognize and uphold the institutions that foster talent. In short, Anupam Kher’s response to Ratna Pathak Shah’s remarks on Indian acting institutes brings attention to the intricacies of the profession and the impact of training on achieving success. His viewpoint adds an important perspective to the ongoing discourse surrounding acting education in India.
